<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zend Framework and Dojo sitting in a tree&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/2008/05/22/zend-framework-and-dojo-sitting-in-a-tree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/2008/05/22/zend-framework-and-dojo-sitting-in-a-tree/</link>
	<description>A book about the Zend Framework</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Warmuz</title>
		<link>http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/2008/05/22/zend-framework-and-dojo-sitting-in-a-tree/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Warmuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/?p=56#comment-199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;in my opinion dojo toolkit shouldn't be bundled with zend framework, cause ZF is a php "framework" that was created for regular web application developers and not for stupid little kids that even don't know how to download dojo. :P (just take a look at some zfforums.com post - there are people that don't even know what arrays in php are - pathetic)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ZF mustn't get involved in such things. It should become compatible with ajax solutions but not specifically one product (here dojo). If it goes this way we'll end up in cms, rather than a framework :(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, the idea of improving compatibility with ajax sounds great!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in my opinion dojo toolkit shouldn&#8217;t be bundled with zend framework, cause ZF is a php &#8220;framework&#8221; that was created for regular web application developers and not for stupid little kids that even don&#8217;t know how to download dojo. <img src='http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> (just take a look at some zfforums.com post - there are people that don&#8217;t even know what arrays in php are - pathetic)</p>

<p>ZF mustn&#8217;t get involved in such things. It should become compatible with ajax solutions but not specifically one product (here dojo). If it goes this way we&#8217;ll end up in cms, rather than a framework <img src='http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>However, the idea of improving compatibility with ajax sounds great!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wan</title>
		<link>http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/2008/05/22/zend-framework-and-dojo-sitting-in-a-tree/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Wan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 06:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zendframeworkinaction.com/?p=56#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great!^^&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!^^</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
